UK - IU Not Dead Yet

Reported by: Dan Rieffer
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 5/31/2012 12:48 am
Kentucky athletics director Mitch Barnhart says he still hopes UK and Indiana can continue their basketball series this December.

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - Negotiations to keep the Kentucky-Indiana basketball series alive have stalled for the second time in a month and there seems to be little chance of reviving it. However, UK athletics director Mitch Barnhart said he hopes a conclusion can be reached to continue the series this December.
     
Indiana athletic director Fred Glass announced May 3 that the series, an annual tradition since 1970, would end because the two schools could not agree on whether to play the games at neutral sites or on the two campuses.
     
According to a letter obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, the two athletic directors reopened negotiations May 10. Two weeks later, the letter said, Kentucky rejected Indiana's offer for a four-year extension that would have put the first two games at Lucas Oil Stadium, which Wildcats coach John Calipari wanted. The third game would have been played at Kentucky and the fourth at Indiana.
     
"I'm disappointed Kentucky rejected what I thought was a compromise that would address everyone's concerns," Glass told The Associated Press. "(Coach) Tom (Crean) and I felt like we tried to be accommodating to Kentucky."
     
Kentucky had a variety of concerns, some of which were explained in the letter dated May 25.
     
Wildcats AD Mitch Barnhart said he didn't receive Glass' letter until Wednesday and expressed additional concerns in a statement released by the athletic department.
     
"I informed Fred that we were disappointed that our previous verbal agreement for a two-year neutral site contract was off the table, but we would consider the new proposal," Barnhart said. "I also noted there were some challenges in our current schedule that were not present prior to Indiana's announcement on May 3 that they were moving on with their schedule for 2012-13."
     
The Wildcats had already scheduled a game for the second Saturday in December, when Indiana and Kentucky traditionally meet. Moving the Portland game from Dec. 8 would have cost Kentucky $100,000.
     
So Glass offered to play the game on Dec. 5, when Kentucky had scheduled a contest against Samford, or to split the cost of the Portland buyout. Glass also said he would assist in dealing with Samford if necessary and even offered to move Indiana's Dec. 22 game to free up a date for the border-state clash.
     
When Calipari announced on Twitter that Kentucky was pursuing a new "non-traditional" scheduling philosophy, Glass had his answer.
     
Glass wrote in the letter that Kentucky spokesman DeWayne Peevy officially rejected the compromise in a phone call May 24.
     
Both schools have historical arguments on their side.
     
The games rotated between Freedom Hall in Louisville and the Hoosier/RCA Dome in Indianapolis from 1991 through 2005. That's when the two schools moved their games back to campus sites, where the rivalry's regular-season games were played exclusively from 1976 through 1986.
     
Indiana doesn't want to add another non-home game to a schedule that already includes the annual Crossroads Classic in Indy, a road game every other year for the ACC-Big Ten Challenge and multiple in games in tournaments contested in Hawaii, Alaska or other places. While some believe the two schools could make more money by playing in larger, off-campus arenas, Indiana believes neutral sites would not create the same atmosphere.
     
"Mitch and I had pretty specific conversations about a neutral site at Indianapolis and a neutral site at Louisville, most likely Lucas Oil Stadium and Freedom Hall," Glass said. "Tom and I didn't feel comfortable about freezing out our students or our season-ticket holders. Since John Calipari said he would be willing to do the Lucas-Lucas deal, that's where our compromise started, and we felt it was only fair to let Kentucky to have the third game with the fourth game coming back to Indiana because that would give next year's (incoming) students an opportunity to see the game on campus."
     
Kentucky still said no thanks because, Glass wrote, the Wildcats did not want to sign a deal that was longer than two years.
     
"If this compromise wasn't acceptable, I don't know what would be," Glass said.
     
What happens next?
     
Kentucky is reviving its series with North Carolina and Calipari has talked about a series with national powerhouse Duke. The Wildcats also have signed a two-year deal to play Baylor, including a men's-women's doubleheader in Dallas.
     
Speculation around Indiana has focused on finding another big-name opponent to replace Kentucky, perhaps Kansas or Louisville, on the schedule. Glass declined to talk specifically about Kansas, but acknowledged it's time for the Hoosiers to start looking for a team to replace Kentucky.
     
Last year, Kentucky and Indiana played two of the college basketball's most entertaining games.
     
Indiana handed the Wildcats their only regular-season loss on a buzzer-beating 3-pointer from Christian Watford that set off a wild celebration and sent students rushing onto the court. Kentucky went on to win the national championship, beating Indiana 102-90 in the regional semifinals.
     
"We've really been focused on trying to keep this series going. That would be our first choice. Now that they've rejected our compromise, we have to move on," Glass said.
     
He added: "I think the idea that has, frankly, been posited by some people who think cooler heads can prevail has been proved basically inaccurate. I think we provided a compromise that to most people would be pretty acceptable."
     
But Kentucky is completely ruling out the possibility of a game this season.
     
Barnhart noted the Wildcats have kept Dec. 15 and Dec. 22 open on the schedule for a possible game against Indiana, that Lucas Oil Stadium is available and that he'd still like to see the game played on one of those dates.
     
"In the best interest of our fans, I would hope we can come to a conclusion to continue this storied series this December," Barnhart said.

Here is Barnhart's statement in its entirety:

"I was contacted by Fred Glass, Indiana AD, on May 10 via telephone about the mutual interest of continuing the series, starting this fall. He mentioned the possibility of a four-year series with the first two years in Indianapolis before playing in Lexington in 2014-15 and Bloomington in 2015-16. I informed Fred that we were disappointed that our previous verbal agreement for a two-year neutral site contract was off the table, but we would consider the new proposal. I also noted there were some challenges in our current schedule that were not present prior to Indiana's announcement on May 3 that they were moving on with their schedule for 2012-13.

After May 3, we finalized a home-neutral series with Baylor for the next two seasons that included our women's teams in a doubleheader in Dallas and restarted our home-and-home series with North Carolina beginning on the road in 2013-14. Those two additions to our schedule were made prior to hearing from Indiana on May 10.

During the process, DeWayne Peevy and I conducted a conference call with Fred Glass on May 21 along with Indiana scheduling contacts Chris Reynolds and Jayd Grossman to further discuss continuing the series. We offered the possibility of playing in Indianapolis on December 15 or 22 this season and possibly playing as part of a multi-team event in Indianapolis again in December 2013 while continuing discussions about a future home-and-home series.

On May 24, DeWayne Peevy expressed to Jayd Grossman our concerns about buying out either Portland or Samford and signing a four-year agreement. Jayd responded that he would talk with Fred about our concerns and also get back to DeWayne about Indiana's availability on December 22. However, we did not receive a response until Fred Glass' letter dated May 25 arrived this afternoon.

We currently do not have any agreements with more than two years remaining and would like to maintain the current flexibility of our future scheduling. If we entered into a four-year deal with Indiana, including the last two years at campus sites, not only would that alter our flexibility but it would also mean that we would have to end our home-and-home series with Louisville in order to keep our non-conference road schedule balanced. We are not interested in doing that.

We also finalized dates with both Samford and Portland that affected Indiana's desire to play on December 5 or 8 this season. We did not feel that it was fair to Samford or Portland to pull out of a contracted game at this point in the scheduling process.

We have held the last two games on our current schedule while continuing discussions with Indiana about playing this fall. December 15 and 22 are still options for the upcoming season and Lucas Oil Stadium is available for both dates. In the best interest of our fans, I would hope we can come to a conclusion to continue this storied series this December."


Share
0 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

No comments yet!

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.

WTVQ.com supports children's privacy rights. All persons under the age of 13 MUST have parental permission to use this website and direct parental supervision is strongly recommended.